This study aims to determine the decision of the Religious Court Judge on the annulment of marriage due to the husband falsifying the status of a boy using Case Number: 686/pdt.G/2021 /PA.KIS) and to find out the consequences of the Religious Court Judge's decision on the cancellation of marriage due to the husband's status using the Case Number: 686/pdt.G/2021/PA.KIS). In this study, qualitative research is used in the form of library research, namely examining the decision of Case Number: 686/pdt.G/2021/PA.KIS at the Kisaran Religious Court. The method used in this study is a normative rule research method. Research on normative rules or research on library rules is a regulatory research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data. the existence of falsification of self-evidence, namely still the status of a person's husband & claiming to be a young man in a marriage between Respondent I and Respondent II, then the marriage is declared null and void because it is proven true & Respondent II has no objections if the marriage is annulled. for the party whose marriage was annulled, it returned to its original status because the marriage was believed to have never existed and the Marriage Certificate Number 147/11/VII/2018 dated July 25, 2018 was declared to have no legal force. about the falsification of self-evidence or crimes against marriage. Article 279 explains that Defendant I & Defendant II are threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of 5 years.