The background of this study is the Implementation of The Law of the Government of Aceh(UUPA) by Legislative and Executive Institutions. The role of both Institutions are demanded by people of Aceh,so that the whole derivation of UUPA are considerably imposed. In fact, however, ishas been 9 years since UUPA was legalised, the implementation has not been comprehensive yet.This study aims to observe how both legislative and executive Institutions impose UUPA,the resistantfactors, and the way out of problematic implementation in Post-UUPA. Moreover,this study also aims to contribute to the development of islamic sosio-politict in relation to the role legislative and executive Institutions. This study elaborates descriptive-qualitative mothod to search, analse, interpret the data,obtained from decumentaries,interviews,andobservations. To analyse the data,this study involves reduction,ptresenting,and summarising the research results. Among the resultsare  the role of legislative Institutions In the implementation UUPA in transferring UUPA to Qanun, asking for approval of central government,the role of the executive Institutions on implying UUPA, running the government upon the Qanun, asking for support from Central House of Representatives(DPR RI),supervising the disitinctive autonomy of Aceh to finalise some law products from UUPA,making serious effort to coordinate with central government in order to resolve all derivatives of UUPA in short time,and asking for support DPR RI monitoring team to intensify the concern to Aceh. The obstacle of the legislative and executive  Institutions in theimplementation of UUPA is the dissimilar  perception in understanding UUPA, political contest among authorities in Aceh, the vestite interest of Central Government in economic, the weakness of lobby or advocate team of Aceh, intanse activiesof both boards, interrupted coordination mechanism, the power of sectoralandego-centrical, external andinternal factor of the government of Aceh. The solution of the problem is to advocate with central government, mutual coordination of whole parties, stengthening advocation lobby from the government of Aceh through influential figures of Aceh at central government