This essay tries to critically evaluate a way of thinking developed among Salafi leader dan PKS as a movement of Islamic revivalism which related to the implementation of Islamic law (syari’ah) into the Indonesian democracy context. There are a number of critical notes was discovered from literary researches and interviews with several leader of the movement. Firstly, basicly both PKS and Salafi leader longing for the implementation of Islamic law in the Indonesian democracy context. Despite the fact that PKS tend to act disparagingly toward democracy, while Salafi clearly repudiate democracy system, however, both of this group agree to “manipulate” this system to strugle for the embodiment of Islamic law with different strategies and substance. Secondly, PKS enters this system while trying to “objectify” Islamic values through preaching dan politics (structurally and culturally). In the same vein, Salafi manipulates democracy to strenghthen their ideological basis and their Islamic puritans awareness through preaching. Regarding politics, Salafi tends to be “pasive”.  Lastly, there are indications that the idea of the Islamic law implementation among PKS leader has dynamically changed following the politics dynamics. This often percieved as an inconsistency by the society. Meanwhile, the idea and efforts to implement Islamic law among Salafi leader is limited to the area of family rule and rarely about public rules. The result of this critical evaluation upon the implementation of Islamic law done by PKS and Salafi leaders, up to this point, have not provide a viable  recomendation as an ideal model of strengthening democracy system and implementing Islamic law in Indonesia.