Keselarasan Femininitas dan Maskulinitas dalam Cerpen “The Other Two” Karya Edith Wharton The Harmony of Femininity and Masculinity in the Short Story Entitled “The Other Two” by Edith Wharton
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper analyzes how harmony between femininity and masculinity is achieved in the short story "The Other Two" by Edith Wharton. The short story tells the story of Alice, who has gone through the failure of her previous two marriages and tries hard to maintain her third marriage with Waythorn. To support the analysis that focuses on Alice and the three men in her life uses concepts of femininity and masculinity, including concept understanding, characteristics, and influencing factors. The research method used is a combination of several methods to obtain a comprehensive analysis. The library method with close reading supports the search for textual data. The contextual method borrows the concepts of femininity and masculinity to support the analysis of textual elements of characters, conflicts, and settings, and the analysis is presented qualitatively. The analysis results show that Alice's femininity tends to be flexible, adaptive, and developed to reduce the turmoil that arose in her third marriage with Waythorn. Alice's flexibility of femininity is also able to melt the stiff atmosphere when the three men in Alice's life with their respective masculinities unexpectedly meet at Waythorn-Alice's house.
Downloads
Article Details
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Beynon, J. (2002). Masculinities and Culture. Open University Press.
Brown-Miller, S. (1984). Femininity. Linden Press/Simo & Schuster.
Burke, P. J., Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1988). Gender Identity, Self-Esteem, and Physical and Sexual Abuse in Dating Relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(3), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786925
Chodorow, N. (1994). Femininities, Masculinities, Sexualities: Freud and Beyond. University Press of Kentucky.
Craik, J. (1994). The Face of Fashion: Cultural Studies in Fashion. Routledge.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fawcett, M. G. (1878). The Future of Englishwomen: A Reply. Nineteenth Century, 4, 347–357. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300150247-014
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press.
Hoftstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences (2nd ed.). Tilburg University. https://www.andrews.edu/~tidwell/bsad560/HofstedeMasculinity.html
Jeffreys, S. (1996). Heterosexuality and the Desire for Gender. In Theorising Heterosexuality: Telling it Straight. Oxford University Press.
Kimmel, M. (2000). The Gendered Society. Oxford University Press.
Kimmel, M., & Aronson, A. (Ed.). (2004). Men and Masculinities: A Social, Cultural, and Historical Encyclopedia Volume I: A–J. ABC-CLIO, Inc.
Kramarae, C., & Treichler, P. A. (1985). A Feminist Dictionary. Pandora Press.
MacNamara, M. C. (1982). What is Feminism? Another View …. Wicca: ‘Wise Woman’ Irish Feminist Magazine, 12, 6–7.
Paechter, C. (2003). Masculinities and Femininities as Communities of Practice. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(02)00356-4
Rinahayu, N., & Kristianto, B. (2022). Konstruksi Hubungan Alam dan Manusia melalui Kerangka Maskulinitas Ekologis dalam Film Jungle (2017): Ekokritik Sastra. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 5(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i1.349
Spence, J. T. (1985). Gender Identity and Implications for Concepts of Masculinity and Femininity. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Psychology and Gender (hal. 59–96). University of Nebraska Press.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents. University of Texas Press.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (n.d.). Femininity/Masculinity. In E. F. Borgatta & R. J. V. Montgomery (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sociology (Revised, hal. 997–1005). Macmillan.
Wharton, E. (1994). The Other Two. In B. H. Solomon (Ed.), Rediscoveries: American Sort Stories by Women, 1832-1916. A Mentor Book.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.