Parking organizers often do not want to replace lost vehicles as written on the ticket. Even though Article 102 of PP 79/2013 stipulates that the parking organizer must replace, but is not equipped with clear sanctions. The problem formulations of this research are the parking control system and the parking manager's responsibility for the parked vehicles loss. The research purpose are to analyze the parking control system and the parking manager's responsibility for the parked vehicles loss. This research is legal research with primary sources, secondary sources, and tertiary sources collected by the literature study method and analyzed by prescriptive methods. The parking control system aims to support the parking work system to make it more effective, efficient and safe. The existence of parking lots, provision of facilities, and security guarantees are a unified system. If there is a parked vehicle missing, the parking organizer must replace it as stipulated in Article 102 PP 79/2013, but the sanctions are not clearly regulated. The inclusion of writing in the parking location that contains a statement that is not responsible for loss is known as a standard clause that contradicts Article 18 of Law 8/1999, and can be sued civilly for illegal acts and defaults based on Article 1694, Article 1234, Article 1239, Article 1365 , 1366, and 1367 BW. So parking organizers must maintain security and replace losses.