Pola Penyelesaian Sengketa Waralaba Produk Teh Poci Di Ponorogo

Main Article Content

Haris Djayadi

Abstract

The purpose of this study is first to find out the pattern of dispute resolution in the franchise practice of Teh Poci, the second is to describe what the ideal pattern should be. In accordance with the characteristics of the existing problems, the most relevant form of approach to analyzing the above problems is empirical legal research. This research sees law as a reality in society, meaning how the law is practiced. The settlement of default on the agreement in the Tea Poci product franchise business in Ponorogo is the cancellation of the contract as a result of default and is settled on the principle of peace, namely by consulting and negotiation techniques. Ideally, under such a mechanism the franchisor should develop an internal procedure for handling complaints. However, this procedure is not stipulated in the franchise agreement and meets certain minimum standards. This standard should provide a procedure for resolving disputes. If a dispute arises, either party can initiate a complaint handling procedure under the Code of Conduct, or under a franchise agreement.

Article Details

How to Cite
Djayadi, H. (2021). Pola Penyelesaian Sengketa Waralaba Produk Teh Poci Di Ponorogo. Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law, 1(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.21154/invest.v1i1.2635
Section
Articles

References

Antia, Kersi D., Xu (Vivian) Zheng, and Gary L. Frazier. “Conflict Management and Outcomes in Franchise Relationships: The Role of Regulation.” Journal of Marketing Research 50, no. 5 (October 24, 2013): 577–89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0144.
Association., American Bar, Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee, American Bar Association., and Section of Litigation. “Alternative Dispute Resolution.” Alternative Dispute Resolution., 2011.
Asuan. “Eksistensi Waralaba (Franchise) Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah No. 42 Tahun 2007 Sebagai Perjanjian Innominaat” 13, no. 42 (2017): 260–71.
harlina, yuni. “KAJIAN HUKUM ISLAM TENTANG WANPRESTASI (INGKAR JANJI) PADA KONSUMEN YANG TIDAK MENERIMA SERTIFIKAT KEPEMILIKAN PEMBELIAN RUMAH.” Hukum Islam; Vol 17, No 1 (2017): PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM KELUARGADO - 10.24014/Hi.V17i1.3909 , September 19, 2018. http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/hukumislam/article/view/3909.
Karamoy, Amir. Percaturan waralaba Indonesia, 2013.
LALALA, EDEN POSTER, I KETUT SUAMBA, and I DEWA AYU SRI YUDHARI. “Analisis Kepuasan Konsumen Pada Produk Waralaba Teh Cap Poci Di Kecamatan Denpasar Selatan Kota Denpasar.” Jurnal Agribisnis Dan Agrowisata (Journal of Agribusiness and Agritourism), January 23, 2017. https://doi.org/10.24843/JAA.2017.v06.i01.p06.
Sourdin, Tania. Alternative Dispute Resolution, 2020.
Widnyana, I Made., and Indonesia. Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa (ADR). Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska bekerja sama dengan BANI (Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia), 2009.
Yuniarti, Rahmi. “Efisiensi Pemilihan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waralaba.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 3 (April 3, 2017). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no3.793.