Studi Sintesis Penelitian Sasatra dengan Objek Karya Sastra Bertema LGBT Menggunakan Model Systematic Review

Main Article Content

Alfian Rokhmansyah

Abstract

Karya sastra bertema LGBT merupakan salah satu karya sastra yang banyak menuai pro dan kontra di masyarakat karena mengusung tema LGBT dan dianggap dapat mempengaruhi pembaca dengan hal-hal negatif sehingga karya sastra tersebut juga sangat tidak dianjurkan sebagai bahan referensi bacaan dalam pembelajaran bahasa dan sastra di seluruh jenjang pendidikan dasar maupun menengah. Akan tetapi, dalam ranah akademik banyak penelitian yang menganalisis karya sastra bertema LGBT dengan berbagai sudut pandang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyintesis kajian-kajian akademik yang mengangkat objek karya sastra bertema LGBT. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian systematic review. Perbandingan yang dilakukan pada artikel ini menggunakan desain meta sintesis. Objek penelitian ini adalah artikel-artikel penelitian yang menggunakan objek kajian karya sastra bertema LGBT, yaitu sebanyak delapan artikel. Meta sintesis yang dilakukan meliputi objek, tujuan, metode, serta teknik pengumpulan dan analisis data. Studi systematic review dengan model meta sintesis terhadap delapan penelitian yang menganalisis karya sastra LGBT ini, diperoleh gambaran bahwa penelitian yang dilakukan cenderung membahas mengenai keberadaan kelompok LGBT. Penelitian-penelitian tersebut bermaksud mengungkap cara pengarang menampilkan tokoh-tokoh LGBT sebagai sebuah kenyataan bahwa mereka ada. Dari hasil penelitian-penelitian tersebut, diperoleh gambaran yang bervariasi terkait pandangan-pandangan pengarang terhadap kelompok LGBT.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rokhmansyah, A. (2018). Studi Sintesis Penelitian Sasatra dengan Objek Karya Sastra Bertema LGBT Menggunakan Model Systematic Review. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 1(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v1i1.7
Section
Articles

References

Aspfors, J., & Fransson, G. (2015). Research on Mentor Education for Mentors of Newly Qualified Teachers: A Qualitative Meta-synthesis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.004
Asri, Y., & Hayati, Y. (2018). The Portrait of LGBT in Modern Indonesia Novels. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education (ICLLE 2018), 524–531. https://doi.org/10.2991/iclle-18.2018.88
Blackburn, M. V., & Clark, C. T. (2011). Analyzing Talk in a Long-Term Literature Discussion Group: Ways of Operating within LGBT-Inclusive and Queer Discourses. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 222–248. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.46.3.2
Blackburn, M. V., Clark, C. T., & Nemeth, E. A. (2015). Examining Queer Elements and Ideologies in LGBT-Themed Literature. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(1), 11–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X15568930
Britzman, D. P. (1995). Is There a Queer Pedagogy? Or Stop Thinking Straight. Educational Theory, 45(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1995.00151.x

Cook, J. R., Rostosky, S. S., & Riggle, E. D. B. (2013). Gender Role Models in Fictional Novels for Emerging Adult Lesbians. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 17(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2012.691416
Davies, S. G. (2018). Gender and Sexual Plurality in Indonesia: Past and Present. In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Indonesia (hal. 322–334). London & New York: Routledge.
DeWitt-Brinks, D., & Rhodes, S. C. (1992). Listening Instruction: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Twenty-Four Selected Studies. Diambil dari https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED351721.pdf
Eagleton, T. (1978). Criticism and Ideology: A Study in Marxist Literary Theory. London: Verso.
Eagleton, T., & Milne, D. (1996). Marxist Literary Theory: A Reader. New Jersey: Wiley. Diambil dari https://books.google.co.id/books?id=UrCln8TYJMEC
Encarnación, O. G. (2014). Gay Rights: Why Democracy Matters. Journal of Democracy, 25(3), 90–102. Diambil dari https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Encarnacion-25-3.pdf
Garnesia, I. (2019, Juni 29). Pandangan Terhadap LGBT: Masih Soal Penyakit Sosial dan Agama. Tirto.id. Diambil dari https://tirto.id/pandangan-terhadap-lgbt-masih-soal-penyakit-sosial-dan-agama-edju
Ismoyo, P. J. (2020). Decolonizing Gender Identities in Indonesia: A Study of Bissu ‘The Trans-Religious Leader’ in Bugis People. Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, 10(3), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.17510/paradigma.v10i3.404
Jagose, A. (1996). Queer Theory: An Introduction. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press.
Keuzenkamp, S., Bos, D., Adolfsen, A., Duyvendak, J. W., & Hekma, G. (2007). Out in the Netherlands: Acceptance of Homosexuality in the Netherlands. The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research (SCP).
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Eversleigh: Keele University.
Lewis, C. (2015). How far have we come? A critical look at LGBTQ identity in young adult literature. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 30(2), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.2072
Marching, S. T. (2008). Herlinatiens: Between Lesbianism, Islam and Feminism. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 9(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649370701789591


Matar, N. I. (1994). Homosexuality in the Early Novels of Nageeb Mahfouz. Journal of Homosexuality, 26(4), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v26n04_05
Murtagh, B. (2007). Beautiful Men in Jakarta and Bangkok. South East Asia Research, 15(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000007781509562
Murtagh, B. (2010). Coklat Stroberi : An Indonesian Romance in Three Flavours. South East Asia Research, 18(2), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000010791513166
Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Patton, M. Q. (2018). Nitel Araştırma Ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri. Anakara: Pegem Akademi.
Perry, A., & Hammond, N. (2002). Systematic Review: The Experience of a PhD Student. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 32–35.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the Findings in Qualitative Studies. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 905–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303253488



Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative Metasynthesis: Issues and Techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(4), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199708)20:4<365::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-E
Saryono, & Rithaudin, A. (2011). Meta Analisis Pengaruh Pembelajaran Pendekatan Taktik (TGfU) terhadap Pengembangan Aspek Kognitif Siswa dalam Pendidikan Jasmani. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 8(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpji.v8i2.3494
Setiawan, H. (2018). Deconstructing Concealed Gayness Text in the Film Negeri van Oranje: Critical Discourse Analysis. Humaniora, 30(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.26991
Swain, K. W. (2007). Gay Pride Needs New Direction. Diambil 21 Oktober 2021, dari The Denver Post website: https://www.denverpost.com/2007/06/21/gay-pride-needs-new-direction/
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta‐synthesis Method for Qualitative Research: a Literature Review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x
Wiyatmi. (2007). Fenomena Homoseksual dalam Novel Indonesia Muthakhir. Diksi, 14(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v14i1.6551
Yeon, L. (2022). Bingkai Heteroseksisme dalam Karya Sastra Indonesia Kontemporer Bertemakan Homoseksualitas. Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, 12(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.17510/paradigma.v12i3.1039