Pengembangan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Tematik Dengan Menggunakan Rubrik Kelas IV di Gugus IV Kecamatan Samarinda Ulu
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to (1) find out the facts of learning in the field towards evaluating thematic learning using the grade IV elementary school rubric; (2) knowing the feasibility of evaluating thematic learning by using the rubric in grade IV elementary school students; (3) knowing the effectiveness of evaluating thematic learning by using the rubric in grade IV elementary school students. This research is a Research and Development (R & D) study with a procedural model that adapts research procedures according to Borg and Gall which can be done in 10 stages (1) research and information collecting, (2) planning, (3) developing preliminary from products, (4) preliminary field testing, (5) main product revision, (6) playing field testing and (7) operational product revision, (8) operational field testing, (9) final product revision, (10) Dissemination and distribution. Evaluation development used is the rubric feasibility assessment sheet using a Likert scale which is made in the form of a checklist and teacher response questionnaire as well as a questionnaire for expert validation. The technical data analysis used in this study is qualitative and quantitative data. The results of this study are as follows. First, the fact of learning in the field towards the development of learning evaluations by using Rubrics after going through the introduction and experiment stages of evaluating students by using rubrics, the teacher who initially did not understand the rubric now understood the rubric. can be seen from the difference in the average pre-test and post-test, namely 52.2 and 88.06. Second, the feasibility of Evaluation of Thematic Learning by using Rubric with 2 material expert Validator Tests of 94.28% and 2 education expert Validator tests of 95%. Third, the effectiveness of evaluating thematic learning by using Rubrics in small group trials was 86.67%, and large group tests were 85.04%.
Downloads
Article Details
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Arikunto. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Aryani, F., & Hiltrimartin, C. (2014). Pengembangan LKS untuk Metode Penemuan Terbimbing pada Pembelajaran Matematika Kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 18 Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2). doi:10.22342/jpm.5.2.578.
Hidayat, S. (2013). Pengembangan Kurikulum Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Kristiantari, M. (2015). Analisis Kesiapan Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Mengimplementasikan Pembelajaran Tematik Integratif Menyongsong Kurikulum 2013.JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 3(2). doi:10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v3i2.4462
Majid, A. (2014). Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurgiyantoro, B. (2012). Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Purnamasari, A. & Rochmawati. (2015). Pengembangan Alat Evaluasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Dengan Wondershare Quiz Creator Materi Sistem Penilaian Persediaan. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi, 3(2). https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpak/article/view/13175
Purwanto. (2010). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rustaman, Y. (2006). “Penilaian Otentik (Authentic Assessmen) dan Penerapannya dalam Pendidikan Sains. http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/SPS/PRODI.PENDIDIKAN_IPA/195012311979032-NURYANI_RUSTAMAN/PENILAIAN_OTENTIK_Sgr'06.pdf
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian & Pengembengan Research and Development. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wangid, M., Mustadi, A., Erviana, V., & Arifin, S. (2014). Kesiapan Guru SD dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tematik-Integratif pada Kurikulum 2013 di DIY. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 2(2), 175-182. doi:10.21831/jpe.v2i2.2717
Wirianto, D. (2014). Perspektif Historis Transformasi Kurikulum di Indonesia. Islamic Studies Journal, 2(1), 133-147. https://www.academia.edu/32791019/Dicky_Wirianto_Perspektif_Historis_Transformasi_Kurikulum_di_Indonesia