Measuring Islamic Bank's Performance Using CAMELS And RGEC Method Based On Indonesian Financial Services Authority Circular
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper aims to determine the differences bank performance of Muamalat BankBank Sinarmas Bank, and BPRS Bhakti Sumekar measured by CAMELS (Capital, Asset, Management, Earning, Liquidity, Sensitivity to Market Risk) method and the RGEC (Risk profile, Good governance, Earning, Capital) method in 2018. The authors used quantitative methods with a descriptive approach. The sample taken in this study is a representation of Islamic commercial banks (Bank Muamalat), Islamic business unit banks (Bank Sinarmas Syariah), and Islamic microfinance banks (BPRS Bhakti Sumekar). The data used in this study are secondary data from the company's published financial report website and annual report. The Analysis techniques used are : 1) Bank Performance analysis using the CAMELS and RGEC methods. 2) Describe the differences in the measurement using the CAMELS and RGEC methods. Finding in this study is the RGEC is a more comprehensive method to measure Islamic bank performance than Camel. This study has limitation, the period used in this study is only 1 (one) year, for more valid results it is necessary to add the sample over several years.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.