Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 235 Download : 187

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Main Article Content

Abstract

The research aims to investigate whether Students’ Readiness toward National Examination (A Case Study in SMPN 2 Palopo). The problem statement of the research was, “How are their readiness in facing national examination”? This research used the Descriptive Quantitative Method. The population of this research was 167 students from the ninth grade students of Junior High School Number 2 Palopo. The total numbers of the students are ten students. The researcher took five students from each class as the sample. The sample was selected using a purposive sampling technique. The researcher used this technique based on their consideration. The result of the analysis can explain that the researcher analyzed the result to measure the students’ readiness in facing national examination. The researcher has conducted the result of the test showed their readiness to face the national examination. The result categorized into average classification. The highest score is 74, the middle score is 66, the lowest score is 60, and the mean score is 67.

Keywords

Students Readiness National Examination

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Iswara Jaya, F. A., Yahya, A., & Jufriadi, J. (2020). National Examination in SMPN 2 Palopo: A Case Study on Students’ Readiness in English Test. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i2.38
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. (2019, November Wednesday). Retrieved November Wednesday, 2019, from http//inomics. com/insight/12-characteristics-of-successful-economics-students-602112
  2. (2019, November Wednesday). Retrieved November Wednesday, 2019, from http://www.columbia.ab. ca/characteristics-great-student/
  3. Alannasir, W. (2020). Characteristic-Based Development Students Aspect. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i1.18
  4. Azhar Arsyad. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Penguasaan Bahasa Inggris Melalui basic vocabulary. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  5. Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10. 1080/0305764X.2011.607151
  6. Dachjar, Dadang. (2016). Smart English Kuasai Vocabulary dan Grammar Tanpa Kamus. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.
  7. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. (1979). Komponen Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: NKKK.
  8. Gee, J. P. (2005). Learning by Design: Good Video Games as Learning Machines. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.5
  9. Guarte, J. M., & Barrios, E. B. (2006). Estimation Under Purposive Sampling. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 35(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610910600591610
  10. Iksan, M. (n.d.). A Survey of Students’ Language Learning Strategies And Their English Learning Achievement In SMA Negeri 1 Palopo.
  11. Iksan, M., & Dirham, D. (2018). The Influence of the Economic Students’ Motivations and Language Learning Strategies towards Their English Achievement in STIE Muhammadiyah Palopo. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 5(1), 110–121.
  12. Ilham, D. (2020). The Challenge of Islamic Education and How to Change. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i1.16
  13. Mangkuatmodjo. (2003). Pengantar Statistik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  14. Masek, A., & Ngah Nasaruddin, N. A. (2016). Students’ Perception and Readiness on School-Based Assessment. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences (November). http://doi.org/ 10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n6p189
  15. Mohan, B. A., & Lo, W. A.-Y. (1985). Academic Writing and Chinese Students: Transfer and Developmental Factors. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586276
  16. Oakes, M. P., & Ji, M. (2012). Quantitative Methods in Corpus-Based Translation Studies: A practical guide to descriptive translation research. John Benjamins Publishing.
  17. Pesanggarahan, Tim Guru. (2011). Mahir Menghadapi Ujian Nasional. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
  18. Rakajoni, T. (1980). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Suatu Tinjauan Pengantar. Jakarta: Proyek Pengembangan Pendidikan Guru.
  19. Richards, Jack C, and Willy A. Renandya. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching an Anthology of Current Practice. The United States of America.
  20. Sardiman. (2014). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Depok: Pustaka Pers.
  21. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Motivation and Self-regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. Routledge.
  22. Wragg, E. C., Bennett, S. N., & Carre, C. G. (1989). Primary teachers and the National Curriculum. Research Papers in Education, 4(3), 17–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152890040303
  23. Taufiq, Rachman Hidayat. (2003). Belajar Mudah Bahasa Inggris. Bandung: Pustaka Pelajar.