Crystallization of The Quran: An Analysis of John Wansbrough’s Theory

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v2i2.1611
Keywords:
Quran, Criticism, John Wansbrough, Crystallization.

Main Article Content

Ahmad Sanusi Azmi
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

Abstract

In the early nineteenth century, modern scholars began to explore materials of Quranic studies within the framework of a historical-critical method. Novel arguments were presented in challenging the traditional account of the formation of the Quran with a various range of theory. It seems that the most radical assessment was demonstrated by John Wansbrough in his exceptional works, Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural. The literary analysis employed by John Wansbrough in his study on the Quran lead to a novel historic inference. This article aims to explore the theory of late crystallization of the Quran as proposed by John Wansbrough. This study is the qualitative research in which the researcher uses the study of the comparative text analysis. The resulting study asserts that Wansbrough’s theory is a new discovery which has given the new impact and the new path in the Quranic studies. His conclusion is not accepted by all scholars. Some scholars regarded Wansbrough’s evidence that he used as an argument is not absolutely convincing.

Article Details

How to Cite
Azmi, A. S. (2017). Crystallization of The Quran: An Analysis of John Wansbrough’s Theory. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya, 2(2), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v2i2.1611
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017)
Section
Articles

Authors who publish in Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

Adams, Charles J. “Reflections on the Work of John Wansbrough.†Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 9, no. 1 (January 1, 1997): 75–90. doi:10.1163/157006897X00061.

Azmi, Ahmad Sanusi. “Dakwaan Orientalis Terhadap Pengaruh Kristian Dalam Al-Quran: Satu Penelitian.†Jurnal Darul Quran 16 (2012): 141–66.

———. “The Intricate Labyrinth Of Qur’Änic References in SÄ«rah Nabawiyyah: An Overview of The Orientalist Works.†Journal Of Hadith Studies 1, no. 1 (2016): 1–6. http://journalofhadith.com/index.php/johs/article/view/3.

Azmi, Ahmad Sanusi, Mohd Yusuf Ismail, Zulhilmi Mohamed Nor, and Amiruddin Mohd Sobali. “Kritikan Terhadap Rasulullah Dan Al-Quran: Analisis Karya Non-Muslim Zaman Umawiyyah Dan Abbasiyyah.†Journal of Hadith Studies 2, no. 1 (June 15, 2017): 18–30. http://journalofhadith.com/index.php/johs/article/view/11.

Azmi, Ahmad Sanusi, Zulhilmi Mohamed Nor, Amiruddin Mohd Sobali, Mohd Yusuf Ismail, and Amran Abdul Halim. “From Christianity to Islam: An Analysis of Ibn Rabban’s Approach towards Sira Nabawiyya.†International Journal of Islamic Thought 11, no. 1 (May 30, 2017): 1–5. doi:10.24035/ijit.11.2017.001.

Bamyeh, Mohammed A. “Review of Crossroads to Islam: The Origins of the Arab Religion and the Arab State by Yehuda D. Nevo and Judith Koren.†International Journal of Middle East Studies 38, no. 2 (2006): 303–304. doi:10.1017/S0020743806212364.

Berg, Herbert. “The Implications Of, and Opposition To, the Methods and Theories of John Wansbrough.†Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 9, no. 1 (1997): 3–22.

Donner, Fred M. Narratives of Islamic Origins The Beginnings of Islamic Historical Writing. New Jersey: The Darwin Press, 1998.

———. Narratives of Islamic Origins The Beginnings of Islamic Historical Writing. Princeton: The Darwin Press, 1998.

Graham, William A. “Review of John Wansbrough, Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation.†Journal of the American Oriental Society 100, no. 2 (1980): 137–41.

Juynboll, Gautier H.A. “Review of John Wansbrough, Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation.†Journal of Semitic Studies 24, no. 2 (1979).

Motzki, Harald. “Alternative Accounts of the Qur’Än’s Formation.†In The Cambridge Companion to the Qur’an, edited by Jane Dammen McAuliffe, 59–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521831601.004.

Nevo, Yehuda D, and Judith Koren. Crossroad to Islam. New York: Prometheus Books, 2003.

Reynolds, Gabriel Said. The Quran In Its Historical Context. London: Routledge, 2008.

Rippin, A. “Muhammad in The Quran: Reading Scripture in The 21st Century.†In The Biography of Muhammad: The Issue of the Sources, edited by H. Motzki. Leiden/Boston/Koln: Brill, 2000.

Saeed, Abdullah. The Quran: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2008.

Wansbrough, John. Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation. New York: Prometheus Books, 2004.

INTERNET

Patricia Crone. “What Do We Actually Know about Mohammed?†openDemocracy. Accessed July 9, 2017. https://www.opendemocracy.net/faith-europe_islam/mohammed_3866.jsp.

Toby Lester. “What Is the Koran?†The Atlantic. Accessed July 8, 2017. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1999/01/what-is-the-koran/304024/?single_page=true.