Keywords
Van Hiele Theory
Constructivism
How to Cite
Abstract
The provision of problem-solving, analytical, systematic, critical, and creative skills is important to improve human resources that can be obtained from learning mathematics. Geometry is a field of mathematics that aims to develop logical thinking skills, develop spatial intuition, and interpret mathematical arguments. Several studies show that students' understanding of geometry material is still at a low level, so it is necessary to develop or improve the geometry learning process. The purpose of this study is to describe the increase in students' geometric thinking levels based on Van Hiele's theory with a constructivism approach. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative with data analysis techniques using the Miles & Huberman model in the form of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that before the learning process using a constructivist approach, students' geometric thinking skills were at levels 1 to 3 or the analysis stage to a formal deduction with the average being at the informal deduction and pre-formal deduction stages. Meanwhile, after the learning process using a constructivist approach was carried out, geometric thinking skills increased at levels 2 to 4 or the informal deduction stage to the rigor with an average increase in the formal deduction stage.
References
Abdussakir. (2009). Pembelajaran geometri sesuai teori Van Hiele. Jurnal Madrasah, II(1). Retrieved from: https://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/madrasah/article/view/1832/pdf.
Alfansyur, A., & Mariyani. (2020). Seni mengelola data: Penerapan triangulasi teknik, sumber dan waktu pada penelitian pendidikan sosial. HISTORIS : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 5(2), 146–150. https://doi.org/10.31764/historis.v5i2.3432.
Amalliyah, N., Dewi, N. R., & Dwijanto. (2021). Tahap berpikir geometri siswa SMA berdasarkan teori Van Hiele ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 352–361.
Bautista, G. H., & Valtoribio, D. C. (2016). An assessment of grade 8 geometry teaching guide of the K to 12 Basic education program based on Van Hiele model of geometric thinking and department of education’s standards. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(18), 1281–1284.
Burger, W. F., & Culpepper, B. (1993). Restructuring geometry. Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics. (P. S. Wilson., Ed.). Macmillan Publishing Company.
Clements, D. H & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D.AGrouws (Ed), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Science of Advanced Materials, 6(4), 420–464.
Creswell, W. J. (2019). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualititatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Pustaka Pelajar
Falbiansyah, F., & Pujiastuti, H. (2021). Analisis penalaran matematis mahasiswa pada materi geometri ditinjau berdasarkan teori Van Hiele. Wahana Didaktika: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 19(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.31851/wahanadidaktika.v19i1.4400.
Jones, K., & Bills, C. (1998). Visualisation, imagery, and the development of geometrical reasoning. Proceeding of the British for Research into Learning Mathematics, 18(1–2), 123–128. Retrieved from: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/41306/.
Junedi, B. (2017). Penerapan teori belajar Van Hiele pada materi geometri di kelas VIII. MES: Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.30743/mes.v3i1.213.
Kamadi, W. S. (2021). Pendekatan keterampilan proses untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa materi keliling dan luas lingkaran kelas VIII-B SMP Negeri 2 Ratolindo. Lentera Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.36312/lpi.v2i2.40.
Kenedi, A. K., Hendri, S., Ladiva, H. B., & Nelliarti. (2018). Kemampuan Koneksi matematis siswa sekolah dasar dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Jurnal Numeracy, 5(2), 226–235. Retrieved from: https://ejournal.bbg.ac.id/numeracy/article/view/396.
Latpate, R., Kshirsagar, J., Kumar Gupta, V., & Chandra, G. (2021). Simple random sampling. In Advanced Sampling Methods. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0622-9_2.
Li, S., Marsaglia, N., Garth, C., Woodring, J., Clyne, J., & Childs, H. (2018). Data Reduction Techniques for Simulation, Visualization and Data Analysis. Computer Graphics Forum, 37(6), 422–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13336.
Miles & Huberman. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif: Buku sumber tentang metode-metode baru. Universitas Indonesia Press.
Muhassanah, N., & Mulyatna, F. (2020). Analisis tingkat berpikir geometris menurut Van Hiele pada mata kuliah geometri analitik ditinjau dari gaya kognitif. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 5(2), 233. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v5i2.6367.
Prasad, S. (2021). Some compromised exponential ratio type imputation methods in simple random sampling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India Section A - Physical Sciences, 91(2), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-020-00719-4.
Putri, L. A., & Nopriana, T. (2019). Tingkat berpikir geometri Van Hiele mahasiswa pendidikan matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 156–165. Retrieved from: http://fkip-unswagati.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/snpm/article/view/849.
Rijali, A. (2019). Analisis data kualitatif. Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 17(33), 81. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v17i33.2374.
Shidiq, U., Choiri, M., & Mujahidin, A. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 221. http://repository.iainponorogo.ac.id/484/1/METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF DI BIDANG PENDIDIKAN.pdf
Skjott, L. M., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012.
Sugiyono, S. (2016). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugrah, N. U. (2020). Implementasi teori belajar konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran sains. Humanika, 19(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v19i2.29274.
Suwito, A., Yuwono, I., Parta, I. N., & Irawati, S. (2017). Geometry high school students thinking ability based on level Van Hiele. International Conference on Mathematics: Education, Theory, and Application (ICMETA), 1, 200–207. Retrieved from: http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/100878.
Van de Walle, J. A. (1994). Elementary School Mathematics. Longman.
Van Hiele, P.M. (1985). The child’s thought and geometry: English translation of selected writing of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and van Hiele. Part III, 243-256. Retrived from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED287697.pdf
Van Hiele, Pierre M. (2020). Developing geometric thinking through activities that begin with play. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 310–316. https://doi.org/10.5951/tcm.5.6.0310.
Wardhani, I. S. (2020). Geometri dan Permasalahannya dalam pembelajaran matematika di sekolah (SUATU penelitian meta analisis). In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika dan Nilai Islami (Vol. 3, Issue 1). Universitas Trunojoyo Madura. Retrieved from: http://conferences.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/SIMANIS/article/view/923.
Watan, S., & Sugiman. (2018). Exploring the relationship between teachers’ instructional and students’ geometrical thinking levels based on Van Hiele theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012122.
Yudianto, E., Sunardi, Sugiarti, T., Susanto, Suharto, & Trapsilasiwi, D. (2018). The identification of van Hiele level students on the topic of space analytic geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012078.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.