Keywords
Word Problems
Climbers
Campers
Quitters
How to Cite
Abstract
Problem-solving ability is a primary skill students should acquire in learning mathematics and is often connected to Adversity Quotient (AQ). This qualitative descriptive study describes the ability to solve PLSV problems regarding AQ (climbers, campers, and quitters) in 7th-grade students of SMP Negeri 21 Surabaya. Data were collected through questionnaires, tests, and interviews using instruments such as the AQ questionnaire sheet, Word Problem Solving Test (TPWP), questionnaires, and interview guidelines. The problem-solving ability in this study refers to the four stages of Polya's problem-solving ability including understanding the problem, planning, implementing, and evaluating. The results of this study showed that (1) the climbers subject was able to accomplish all of Polya's stages, (2) the campers subject, was able to accomplish three stages of Polya's problem solving, which were able to understand the problem, plan the problem solving, and carry out the problem-solving. Whereas, (3) the quitters subject, was unable to complete Polya's problem-solving stages as it showed that the subject was poorly understanding the problem, planning to solve the problem, implementing the solution plan, and incapable of looking back at problems that had been solved.
References
Abdiyani, S. S., Khabibah, S., & Rahmawati, N. D. (2019). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMP Negeri 1 Jogoroto berdasarkan langkah-langkah Polya ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 7(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v7i2.774
Aini, N. N., & Mukhlis, M. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah pada soal cerita matematika berdasarkan teori Polya ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2020.v2i1.105-128
Benyamin, B., Qohar, A., & Sulandra, I. M. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA Kelas X dalam memecahkan masalah SPLTV. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.574
Chabibah, L. N., Siswanah, E., & Tsani, D. F. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita barisan ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i2.29024
Fatmawati, H., Mardiyana, & Triyanto. (2014). Analisis berpikir kritis siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan Polya pada pokok bahasan persamaan kuadrat. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(9), 911–922.
Giardino, V., & Wöpking, J. (2019). Aspect seeing and mathematical representations. Avant, 10(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.26913/AVANT.2019.02.27
Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Apino, E., & Wulandari, N. F. (2018). The difficulties of high school students in solving higher-order thinking skills problems. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.520
Hidayat, W., & Sariningsih, R. (2018). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan adversity quotient siswa SMP melalui pembelajaran open ended. Jurnal JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 2(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8479(96)90008-8
Inayah, S. (2018). Peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan representasi multipel matematis dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kuantum. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22236/kalamatika.vol3no1.2018pp1-16
Isnaini, N., Ahied, M., Qomaria, N., & Munawaroh, F. (2021). Kemampuan Pemecahan masalah berdasarkan teori Polya pada siswa kelas VIII SMP ditinjau dari gender. Natural Science Education Research, 4(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v4i1.8489
Mastuti, A. G., & Prayitno, L. L. (2023). Exploring high school teacher’s design of rich algebra tasks. Jurnal Elemen, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i1.5851
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publication.
Mulis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2015). TIMSS 2015 International results in mathematics (IEA (ed.)).
Muttaqien, A. (2016). Representasi matematis pada pemecahan word problem perbandingan inkonsisten. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2016.1.2.99-116
Nababan, R. J., Sutriyono, & Pratama, F. W. (2018). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMP berdasarkan tahapan polya ditinjau dari adversity quotient. JP3M: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 80–92. Retrieved from: http://journal-litbang-rekarta.co.id/index.php/jp3m/article/view/28
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Inc. Retrieved from: https://www.rainierchristian.org/NCTM_principles-and-standards-for-school-mathematics.pdf
Obersteiner, A., Van Dooren, W., Van Hoof, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2013). The natural number bias and magnitude representation in fraction comparison by expert mathematicians. Learning and Instruction, 28, 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.003
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving (Revised Edition). In OECD Publishing. OECD.
Polya, G. (1985). How to solve it (A new aspect of mathematical method). Priceton University Press.
Prayitno, L. L., Mutianingsih, N., Lestari, D. A., Rosyidah, A. D. A., & Sumianto, D. (2023). Kesalahan calon guru matematika dalam mengembangkan modul ajar jenjang sekolah menengah. Jurnal Ilmiah Soulmath : Jurnal Edukasi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.25139/smj.v11i1.5694
Prayitno, L. L., Purwanto, P., Subanji, S., Susiswo, S., & Mutianingsih, N. (2022). Students’ semantic reasoning characteristics on solving double discount problem. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 7(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v7i2.16325
Prayitno, L. L., Purwanto, Subanji, Susiswo, & As’ari, A. R. (2020). Exploring student’s representation process in solving ill-structured problems geometry. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.17275/PER.20.28.7.2
Rachmawati, Y. I., Sugandi, E., & Prayitno, L. L. (2019). Senior high school students’ ability in posing system of linear equations in two variables problems. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 4(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v4i1.6954
Riskiyah, S., Jannah, U. R., & Aini, S. D. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sMA berkemampuan matematika tinggi dalam menyelesaikan masalah fungsi. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2018.1.2.111-122
Septiani, E. S., & Nurhayati, E. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis ditinjau dari adversity quotient (AQ) peserta didik melalui model problem based learning (PBL). Prosiding SeminarNasional & Call For Papers, 168–175. Retrieved from: https://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/sncp/article/view/1039
Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity quotient: Mengubah hambatan menjadi peluang (Adversity quotient: Turning obstacles into opportunities). PT Grasindo.
Upu, H., Darwis, M., & Maimunah. (2022). Analysis ability in solving mathematics problems based on Polya’s steps viewed from adversity quotient students of MTs Syekh Yusuf Gowa [Universitas Negeri Makassar]. https://doi.org/10.21608/pshj.2022.250026
Wafiqoh, R., Darmawijoyo, D., & Hartono, Y. (2016). LKS berbasis model eliciting activities untuk mengetahui kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika di kelas VIII. Jurnal Elemen, 2(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v2i1.176
Yuwono, T., Supanggih, M., & Ferdiani, R. D. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita berdasarkan prosedur Polya. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 1(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2018.1.2.137-144
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.